| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Hortaliças. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/11/2000 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/09/2016 |
|
Autoria: |
ZAMBOLIM, L. (ed.). |
|
Afiliação: |
LAERCIO ZAMBOLIM. |
|
Título: |
Manejo integrado: doenças, pragas e plantas daninhas. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2000 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Vicosa, MG: UFV, 2000. |
|
Páginas: |
416 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Manejo integrado em defesa vegetal; Métodos de determinação de danos e perdas em fitopatologia; Monitoramento espaço-temporal: uma ferramenta no manejo integrado de doenças; Sistema de previsão de doenças de hortaliças: tomate, batata, cebola, cenoura, melão; Bacterioses de hortaliças: situação atual e perspectivas de controle; Premunização: perspectivas e aplicações no controle de fitoviroses; Formigas cortadeiras: atualidades no combate; Manejo integrado de pragas de hortaliças; Limitações de métodos de controle para o manejo de pragas; Estratégias de manejo de plantas daninhas; Manejo integrado de plantas daninhas em hortaliças; Doenças bacterianas de plantas no Brasil: problemas e perspectivas de controle; Controle químico de doenças de hortaliças no contexto do manejo integrado de doenças. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Abobrinha; Batata-doce; Brasil; Brassica oleracea botryts; Brassica oleracea italica; Carrot; Chili; Couve-chinesa; Couve-flor; Cucumber; Disease; Feijao-de-vagem; Fungus; Gilo; IDM; Integrated diseases management; IPM; Manejo integrado de doencas; Manejo integrado de pragas; Melon; MIP; Onion; Planta daninha; Plants; Roquete; Salsao; Salsinha; Sistema de previsao; Snap bean; Strawberry; Sweet pepper; Swiss chard. |
|
Thesagro: |
Abelmoschus Esculentus; Alface; Alho; Allium Cepa; Allium Schoenoprasum; Almeirão; Bactéria; Batata; Berinjela; Beta Vulgaris Cicla; Brassica Chinensis; Brassica Oleracea Acephala; Brassica Oleracea Capitata; Brócolo; Capsicum Annuum; Cebola; Cebolinha; Cenoura; Cichorium Intybus; Controle Químico; Couve; Cucumis Melo; Cucumis Sativus; Cucúrbita Pepo; Daucus Carota; Doença; Eruca Sativa; Erva Daninha; Fungicida; Fungo; Herbicida; Hortaliça; Ipomoea Batatas; Jiló; Lactuca Sativa; Lycopersicon Esculentum; Melão; Morango; Pepino; Petroselinum Crispum; Phaseolus Vulgaris; Pimenta; Pimentão; Planta; Quiabo; Repolho; Rúcula; Solanum Gilo; Solanum Tuberosum; Tomate. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Brazil; broccoli; cabbage; Capsicum frutescens; cauliflower; chemical control; chicory; Chinese cabbage; chives; Fragaria ananassa; fungicides; herbicides; integrated pest management; kale; lettuce; okra; parsley; potatoes; sweet potatoes; tomatoes; vegetables; weeds; zucchini. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04083nam a2201381 a 4500
001 2052753
005 2016-09-13
008 2000 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
100 1 $aZAMBOLIM, L.
245 $aManejo integrado$bdoenças, pragas e plantas daninhas.
260 $aVicosa, MG: UFV$c2000
300 $a416 p.
520 $aManejo integrado em defesa vegetal; Métodos de determinação de danos e perdas em fitopatologia; Monitoramento espaço-temporal: uma ferramenta no manejo integrado de doenças; Sistema de previsão de doenças de hortaliças: tomate, batata, cebola, cenoura, melão; Bacterioses de hortaliças: situação atual e perspectivas de controle; Premunização: perspectivas e aplicações no controle de fitoviroses; Formigas cortadeiras: atualidades no combate; Manejo integrado de pragas de hortaliças; Limitações de métodos de controle para o manejo de pragas; Estratégias de manejo de plantas daninhas; Manejo integrado de plantas daninhas em hortaliças; Doenças bacterianas de plantas no Brasil: problemas e perspectivas de controle; Controle químico de doenças de hortaliças no contexto do manejo integrado de doenças.
650 $aBrazil
650 $abroccoli
650 $acabbage
650 $aCapsicum frutescens
650 $acauliflower
650 $achemical control
650 $achicory
650 $aChinese cabbage
650 $achives
650 $aFragaria ananassa
650 $afungicides
650 $aherbicides
650 $aintegrated pest management
650 $akale
650 $alettuce
650 $aokra
650 $aparsley
650 $apotatoes
650 $asweet potatoes
650 $atomatoes
650 $avegetables
650 $aweeds
650 $azucchini
650 $aAbelmoschus Esculentus
650 $aAlface
650 $aAlho
650 $aAllium Cepa
650 $aAllium Schoenoprasum
650 $aAlmeirão
650 $aBactéria
650 $aBatata
650 $aBerinjela
650 $aBeta Vulgaris Cicla
650 $aBrassica Chinensis
650 $aBrassica Oleracea Acephala
650 $aBrassica Oleracea Capitata
650 $aBrócolo
650 $aCapsicum Annuum
650 $aCebola
650 $aCebolinha
650 $aCenoura
650 $aCichorium Intybus
650 $aControle Químico
650 $aCouve
650 $aCucumis Melo
650 $aCucumis Sativus
650 $aCucúrbita Pepo
650 $aDaucus Carota
650 $aDoença
650 $aEruca Sativa
650 $aErva Daninha
650 $aFungicida
650 $aFungo
650 $aHerbicida
650 $aHortaliça
650 $aIpomoea Batatas
650 $aJiló
650 $aLactuca Sativa
650 $aLycopersicon Esculentum
650 $aMelão
650 $aMorango
650 $aPepino
650 $aPetroselinum Crispum
650 $aPhaseolus Vulgaris
650 $aPimenta
650 $aPimentão
650 $aPlanta
650 $aQuiabo
650 $aRepolho
650 $aRúcula
650 $aSolanum Gilo
650 $aSolanum Tuberosum
650 $aTomate
653 $aAbobrinha
653 $aBatata-doce
653 $aBrasil
653 $aBrassica oleracea botryts
653 $aBrassica oleracea italica
653 $aCarrot
653 $aChili
653 $aCouve-chinesa
653 $aCouve-flor
653 $aCucumber
653 $aDisease
653 $aFeijao-de-vagem
653 $aFungus
653 $aGilo
653 $aIDM
653 $aIntegrated diseases management
653 $aIPM
653 $aManejo integrado de doencas
653 $aManejo integrado de pragas
653 $aMelon
653 $aMIP
653 $aOnion
653 $aPlanta daninha
653 $aPlants
653 $aRoquete
653 $aSalsao
653 $aSalsinha
653 $aSistema de previsao
653 $aSnap bean
653 $aStrawberry
653 $aSweet pepper
653 $aSwiss chard
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/09/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/09/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
BARUSELLI, P. S.; ABREU, L. A. de; PAULA, V. R. de; CARVALHO, B. C. de; GRICIO, E. A.; MORI, F. K.; REBEIS, L. M.; ALBERTINI, S.; SOUZA, A. H. de; D'OCCHIO. |
|
Afiliação: |
PIETRO SAMPAIO BARUSELLI, NIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; LAÍS ÂNGELO DE ABREU, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; VANESSA ROMARIO DE PAULA, CNPGL; BRUNO CAMPOS DE CARVALHO, CNPGL; EMANUELLE ALMEIDA GRICIO, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; FERNANDO KENJI MORI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; LÍGIA MATTOS REBEIS, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; SOFÍA ALBERTINI, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; ALEXANDRE HENRILY DE SOUZA, CARGILL NUTRIÇÃO ANIMAL; MICHAEL D'OCCHIO, UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY. |
|
Título: |
Applying assisted reproductive technology and reproductive management to reduce CO2-equivalent emission in dairy and beef cattle: a review. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Reproduction, v. 20, n. 2, e20230060, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0060 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Methane emission from beef and dairy cattle combined contributes around 4.5-5.0% of total anthropogenic global methane. In addition to enteric methane (CH4) produced by the rumen, cattle production also contributes carbon dioxide (CO2) (feed), nitrous oxide (N2O) (feed production, manure) and other CH4 (manure) to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of beef and dairy production systems. The relative contribution in standard dairy systems is typically enteric CH4 58%, feed 29% and manure 10%. Herds with low production efficiency can have an enteric CH4 contribution up to 90%. Digestibility of feed can impact CH4 emission intensity. Low fertility herds also have a greater enteric CH4 contribution. Animals with good feed conversion efficiency have a lower emission intensity of CH4/kg of meat or milk. Feed efficient heifers tend to be lean and have delayed puberty. Fertility is a major driver of profit in both beef and dairy cattle, and it is highly important to apply multi-trait selection when shifting herds towards improved efficiency and reduced CH4. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified for feed efficiency in cattle and are used in genomic selection. SNPs can be utilized in artificial insemination and embryo transfer to increase the proportion of cattle that have the attributes of efficiency, fertility and reduced enteric CH4. Prepubertal heifers genomically selected for favourable traits can have oocytes recovered to produce IVF embryos. Reproductive technology is predicted to be increasingly adopted to reduce generation interval and accelerate the rate of genetic gain for efficiency, fertility and low CH4 in cattle. The relatively high contribution of cattle to anthropogenic global methane has focussed attention on strategies to reduce enteric CH4 without compromising efficiency and fertility. Assisted reproductive technology has an important role in achieving the goal of multiplying and distributing cattle that have good efficiency, fertility and low CH4. MenosMethane emission from beef and dairy cattle combined contributes around 4.5-5.0% of total anthropogenic global methane. In addition to enteric methane (CH4) produced by the rumen, cattle production also contributes carbon dioxide (CO2) (feed), nitrous oxide (N2O) (feed production, manure) and other CH4 (manure) to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of beef and dairy production systems. The relative contribution in standard dairy systems is typically enteric CH4 58%, feed 29% and manure 10%. Herds with low production efficiency can have an enteric CH4 contribution up to 90%. Digestibility of feed can impact CH4 emission intensity. Low fertility herds also have a greater enteric CH4 contribution. Animals with good feed conversion efficiency have a lower emission intensity of CH4/kg of meat or milk. Feed efficient heifers tend to be lean and have delayed puberty. Fertility is a major driver of profit in both beef and dairy cattle, and it is highly important to apply multi-trait selection when shifting herds towards improved efficiency and reduced CH4. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified for feed efficiency in cattle and are used in genomic selection. SNPs can be utilized in artificial insemination and embryo transfer to increase the proportion of cattle that have the attributes of efficiency, fertility and reduced enteric CH4. Prepubertal heifers genomically selected for favourable traits can have oocytes recovered to produce IVF embryos. Reproductive... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Metano entérico; Reprodução assistida. |
|
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Eficiência Reprodutiva; Fertilidade Animal; Reprodução Animal. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1156935/1/Applying-assisted-reproductive-technology-and-reproductive-management.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03002naa a2200313 a 4500
001 2156935
005 2023-09-27
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0060$2DOI
100 1 $aBARUSELLI, P. S.
245 $aApplying assisted reproductive technology and reproductive management to reduce CO2-equivalent emission in dairy and beef cattle$ba review.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aMethane emission from beef and dairy cattle combined contributes around 4.5-5.0% of total anthropogenic global methane. In addition to enteric methane (CH4) produced by the rumen, cattle production also contributes carbon dioxide (CO2) (feed), nitrous oxide (N2O) (feed production, manure) and other CH4 (manure) to the total greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of beef and dairy production systems. The relative contribution in standard dairy systems is typically enteric CH4 58%, feed 29% and manure 10%. Herds with low production efficiency can have an enteric CH4 contribution up to 90%. Digestibility of feed can impact CH4 emission intensity. Low fertility herds also have a greater enteric CH4 contribution. Animals with good feed conversion efficiency have a lower emission intensity of CH4/kg of meat or milk. Feed efficient heifers tend to be lean and have delayed puberty. Fertility is a major driver of profit in both beef and dairy cattle, and it is highly important to apply multi-trait selection when shifting herds towards improved efficiency and reduced CH4. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified for feed efficiency in cattle and are used in genomic selection. SNPs can be utilized in artificial insemination and embryo transfer to increase the proportion of cattle that have the attributes of efficiency, fertility and reduced enteric CH4. Prepubertal heifers genomically selected for favourable traits can have oocytes recovered to produce IVF embryos. Reproductive technology is predicted to be increasingly adopted to reduce generation interval and accelerate the rate of genetic gain for efficiency, fertility and low CH4 in cattle. The relatively high contribution of cattle to anthropogenic global methane has focussed attention on strategies to reduce enteric CH4 without compromising efficiency and fertility. Assisted reproductive technology has an important role in achieving the goal of multiplying and distributing cattle that have good efficiency, fertility and low CH4.
650 $aBovino
650 $aEficiência Reprodutiva
650 $aFertilidade Animal
650 $aReprodução Animal
653 $aMetano entérico
653 $aReprodução assistida
700 1 $aABREU, L. A. de
700 1 $aPAULA, V. R. de
700 1 $aCARVALHO, B. C. de
700 1 $aGRICIO, E. A.
700 1 $aMORI, F. K.
700 1 $aREBEIS, L. M.
700 1 $aALBERTINI, S.
700 1 $aSOUZA, A. H. de
700 1 $aD'OCCHIO
773 $tAnimal Reproduction$gv. 20, n. 2, e20230060, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
